The curated resources linked below are an initial sample of the resources coming from a collaborative and rigorous review process with the EAD Content Curation Task Force.
In many ways, the history of the US has been shaped by the movement of people. People came to America searching for gold as early as the fifteenth century, while others sought religious freedom and increased economic mobility. Millions of others were forced here against their will. This primary source set will spotlight the causes and impacts of migration and movement, focusing primarily on the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Contexts include slavery, Black migration after the abolition of slavery, immigration to the United States and the immigrant experience, Dust Bowl migration, westward movement by European Americans, and Indigenous relocation and removal. Recognizing that movement often occurs after and during transition or change, this source kit will also highlight several catalysts that brought about migration and movement, some occurring at the same moment in history. These primary sources will also present varying attitudes and perceptions toward migration and movement spanning this period. This topic could be expanded by comparing migration patterns as early as the colonial period and as recent as today.
The resources in this spotlight kit are intended for classroom use, and are shared here under a CC-BY-SA license. Teachers, please review the copyright and fair use guidelines.
The Roadmap
- Primary Resources by Era/Date1700s (1)1800s (16)1900s (12)
- All 29 Primary ResourcesU.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 9 (1787)
This clause of the United States Constitution is seen as both a temporary protection for the slave trade and as a clear indication that enslaved people were not considered United States citizens under the Constitution.
United States Constitution, Article I: Legislative BranchSection 9 : Powers Denied Congress Clause 1 Migration or Importation The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
CitePrintShare“Article I Section 9 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress.” Constitution Annotated, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-9/.
A letter from President Andrew Jackson to the Cherokee Nation about the benefits of voluntary removal, March 16, 1835A letter from President Andrew Jackson to the Cherokee Nation about the benefits of voluntary removal, March 16, 1835TranscriptMy Friends:
I have long viewed your condition with great interest. For many years I have been acquainted with your people, and under all variety of circumstances, in peace and war. Your fathers were well known to me, and the regard which I cherished for them has caused me to feel great solicitude for your situation….
You are now placed in the midst of a white population…. Most of your people are uneducated, and are liable to be brought into collision at all times with their white neighbors. Your young men are acquiring habits of intoxication. With strong passions, and without those habits of restraint which our laws inculcate and render necessary, they are frequently driven to excesses which must eventually terminate in their ruin. The game has disappeared among you, and you must depend upon agriculture and the mechanic arts for support. And, yet, a large portion of your people have acquired little or no property in the soil itself, or in any article of personal property which can be useful to them. How, under these circumstances, can you live in the country you now occupy? Your condition must become worse and worse, and you will ultimately disappear, as so many tribes have done before you.
Of all this I warned your people, when I met them in council eighteen years ago. I then advised them to sell out their possessions east of the Mississippi and to remove to the country west of that river. This advice I have continued to give you at various times from that period down to the present day, and can you now look back and doubt the wisdom of this counsel?....
President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law in 1830. This law granted the President the ability to exchange land west of the Mississippi for Indigenous territories within the boundaries of existing states. An additional act was passed in 1834. This act designated land, including what would later become the state of Oklahoma, as Indian Territory. As a result of the precedent set by these acts, over sixty tribes were either willingly or forcibly removed from their lands over the next fifty years.
CitePrintShareJackson, Andrew, “To the Cherokee tribe of Indians east of the Mississippi River,” Digital Public Library of America, https://dp.la/primary-source-sets/cherokee-removal-and-the-trail-of-tears/sources/1506
George Catlin, Wi-jún-jon, Pigeon's Egg Head (The Light) Going To and Returning From Washington (1837-1839)The Smithsonian American Art Museum explains: “Catlin mistranslated Ah-jon-jon, whose name means ‘The Light,’ as ‘Pigeon's Egg Head.’ The Light was an Assiniboine leader who was invited in 1831 to represent his tribe in Washington. During a winter in the nation's capital, he traded his native dress for European clothes and customs. In Catlin's before-and-after portrait, the once proud warrior, with a liquor bottle in his pocket, swaggers in high-heeled boots and carries a fan and umbrella. For Catlin, this transformation illustrated the tragic gulf between Native American and white cultures.”
CitePrintShareGeorge Catlin, Wi-jún-jon, Pigeon's Egg Head (The Light) Going To and Returning From Washington, 1837-1839, oil on canvas, Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of Mrs. Joseph Harrison, Jr., 1985.66.474. Retrieved from https://americanart.si.edu/artwork/wi-jun-jon-pigeons-egg-head-light-going-and-returning-washington-4317.
Letter from Chief John Ross, "To the Senate and House of Representatives" (1836)TranscriptA spurious Delegation, in violation of a special injunction of the general council of the nation, proceeded to Washington City with this pretended treaty, and by false and fraudulent representations supplanted in the favor of the Government the legal and accredited Delegation of the Cherokee people, and obtained for this instrument, after making important alterations in its provisions, the recognition of the United States Government. And now it is presented to us as a treaty, ratified by the Senate, and approved by the President [Andrew Jackson], and our acquiescence in its requirements demanded, under the sanction of the displeasure of the United States, and the threat of summary compulsion, in case of refusal. It comes to us, not through our legitimate authorities, the known and usual medium of communication between the Government of the United States and our nation, but through the agency of a complication of powers, civil and military.
By the stipulations of this instrument, we are despoiled of our private possessions, the indefeasible property of individuals. We are stripped of every attribute of freedom and eligibility for legal self-defense. Our property may be plundered before our eyes; violence may be committed on our persons; even our lives may be taken away, and there is none to regard our complaints. We are denationalized; we are disfranchised. We are deprived of membership in the human family! We have neither land nor home, nor resting place that can be called our own. And this is effected by the provisions of a compact which assumes the venerated, the sacred appellation of treaty.
In 1835, in the “Treaty of New Echota,” a group of Cherokees – without consent of the majority of their nation – agreed that the Cherokee people would move West and vacate their land. This letter, a protest against the Treaty, was sent by Chief John Ross and other Cherokee leaders to Congress in an effort to declare that treaty invalid.
CitePrintShare“Transcript for papers-of-john-ross-original-text.” National Museum of the American Indian, https://americanindian.si.edu/nk360/removal-cherokee/transcripts/papers-of-john-ross-original-text.html.
“Africans in America/Part 4/John Ross letter.” PBS, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4h3083t.html
Physician's Monthly Report of Emigrating Cherokees at Chadata (1838)During the fall and winter of 1838 and 1839, the Cherokees were forcibly marched from their lands. Known as the “Trail of Tears,” this forced removal resulted in the deaths of thousands of Cherokee. The Choctaw, the Chickasaw, the Creek, and the Seminole also were forced to travel along the trail of tears.
CitePrintSharePhysician's Monthly Report of Emigrating Cherokees at Chadata in August 1838; 8/1838; Special Files, ca. 1840 - ca. 1904; Records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Record Group 75; National Archives Building, Washington, DC. [Online Version, https://www.docsteach.org/documents/document/physicians-report-cherokees, February 12, 2022]
Drexler, K. (2019, January 22). Research Guides: Indian Removal Act: Primary Documents in American History: Introduction. Library of Congress. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://guides.loc.gov/indian-removal-act.
Death of Captain Ferrer, the Captain of the Amistad (1839)In 1839, the enslaved people aboard the Amistad were captured by Portuguese slave traders in Sierra Leone, and they were being taken to a Caribbean plantation. The enslaved Africans seized control of the ship, killed two of their captors, and ordered the ship to sail to Africa, but it was seized off of the coast of Long Island and the enslaved Africans were brought to trial in Connecticut. As the National Archives explains, “Had it not been for the actions of abolitionists in the United States, the issues related to the Amistad might have ended quietly in an admiralty court. But they used the incident as a way to expose the evils of slavery and generate significant opposition to the practice.” In an appeal before the U.S. Supreme Court, John Quincy Adams “passionately and eloquently defended the Africans' right to freedom on both legal and moral grounds, referring to treaties prohibiting the slave trade and to the Declaration of Independence. The Supreme Court decided in favor of the Africans, stating that they were free individuals.”
CitePrintShareSchomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, Manuscripts, Archives, and Rare Books Division, The New York Public Library. (1840). Death of Captain Ferrer, the Captain of the Amistad, July 1839. Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47e3-1a6d-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99
“The Amistad Case | National Archives.” National Archives |, 2 June 2021, https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/amistad#background.
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848)TranscriptFebruary 2, 1848
In the name of Almighty God
The United States of America and the United Mexican States animated by a sincere desire to put an end to the calamities of the war which unhappily exists between the two Republics and to establish Upon a solid basis relations of peace and friendship, which shall confer reciprocal benefits upon the citizens of both, and assure the concord, harmony, and mutual confidence wherein the two people should live, as good neighbors have for that purpose appointed their respective plenipotentiaries, that is to say….
ARTICLE I
There shall be firm and universal peace between the United States of America and the Mexican Republic, and between their respective countries, territories, cities, towns, and people, without exception of places or persons….
ARTICLE VIII
Mexicans now established in territories previously belonging to Mexico, and which remain for the future within the limits of the United States, as defined by the present treaty, shall be free to continue where they now reside, or to remove at any time to the Mexican Republic, retaining the property which they possess in the said territories, or disposing thereof, and removing the proceeds wherever they please, without their being subjected, on this account, to any contribution, tax, or charge whatever.
Those who shall prefer to remain in the said territories may either retain the title and rights of Mexican citizens, or acquire those of citizens of the United States. But they shall be under the obligation to make their election within one year from the date of the exchange of ratifications of this treaty; and those who shall remain in the said territories after the expiration of that year, without having declared their intention to retain the character of Mexicans, shall be considered to have elected to become citizens of the United States….
ARTICLE IX
The Mexicans who, in the territories aforesaid, shall not preserve the character of citizens of the Mexican Republic, conformably with what is stipulated in the preceding article, shall be incorporated into the Union of the United States, and be admitted at the proper time (to be judged of by the Congress of the United States) to the enjoyment of all the rights of citizens of the United States, according to the principles of the Constitution; and in the mean time, shall be maintained and protected in the free enjoyment of their liberty and property, and secured in the free exercise of their religion without; restriction.
Article XI
Considering that a great part of the territories, which, by the present treaty, are to be comprehended for the future within the limits of the United States, is now occupied by savage tribes, who will hereafter be under the exclusive control of the Government of the United States, and whose incursions within the territory of Mexico would be prejudicial in the extreme, it is solemnly agreed that all such incursions shall be forcibly restrained by the Government of the United States whensoever this may be necessary; and that when they cannot be prevented, they shall be punished by the said Government, and satisfaction for the same shall be exacted all in the same way, and with equal diligence and energy, as if the same incursions were meditated or committed within its own territory, against its own citizens.
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo held a direct correlation to westward movement and migration. Americans forged west with the discovery of gold in 1848 at Sutter’s Mill in California which was the first major gold rush in the United States. By the following year, tens of thousands of “forty-niners” had come to the area in hopes of striking it rich. Most did not become wealthy in California, but many stayed there. The region continued to grow rapidly, and, in 1850, California became a state. With the expansion of available land and the gold rush, people from all over the USA and the world came and new businesses developed, including the pony express, transcontinental railroad jobs, Chinese laundry, the cattle industry, and free and enslaved Africans seeking freedom.
CitePrintShareTreaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. BlackPast, B. (2007, January 24). (1848) Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. BlackPast.org. https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/treaty-guadalupe-hidalgo/
https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/treaty-guadalupe-hidalgo/
Engraving of the Box in which Henry Box Brown Escaped from Slavery (1850)Engraving of the box in which Henry Box Brown escaped from slavery in Richmond, Va.The Fugitive Slave Act was passed in 1850 as part of the Compromise of 1850, a series of laws designed to ease sectional tensions between the North and South. The law benefitted southern enslavers by requiring northern law enforcement to assist in capturing and returning enslaved persons who had run away from their enslavers. Southern bounty hunters were also permitted to operate in the North. The law put both enslaved and free Blacks at risk. After the law was passed, thousands of freedom seekers attempted to escape to free states in the North and Canada as well, where they would be beyond the reach of the law.
CitePrintShareBrown, H. B. (1850) Engraving of the box in which Henry Box Brown escaped from slavery in Richmond, Va. Song, sung by Mr. Brown on being removed from the box. Boston Laing's Steam Press, 1-1-2 Water Street. 185-?. Boston. [Pdf] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/rbpe.06501600/.
Parks, L. (1852) Poster offering fifty dollars reward for the capture of a runaway slave Stephen. Parks' Landing. [Pdf] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/rbpe.00101200/.
Poster Offering Fifty Dollars Reward for the Capture of a Runaway Slave Stephen (1852)Poster Offering Fifty Dollars Reward for the Capture of a Runaway Slave Stephen (1852)Mining life in California--Chinese miners (1857)Mining life in California--Chinese miners (1857)During the peak of the Gold Rush, over 20,000 Chinese men immigrated to the United States to mine gold in California. Chinese immigrant labor contributed significantly to not only the mining industry, but also the expansion of the national railroad and the development of services supporting laborers. Nonetheless, xenophobic, anti-Chinese sentiment rose in California and nationally, ultimately leading to both the Chinese Massacre of 1871 (in which a violent mob lynched 18 Chinese men) and the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.
CitePrintShare(1857) Mining life in California--Chinese miners. California, 1857. [Photograph] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/2001700332/.
The Fugitive Slave Law and its Victims, excerpt (1861)The Fugitive Slave Law and its Victims, excerpt (1861)This book, The Fugitive Slave Law and its Victims, published in 1861, was an antislavery text, arguing for the abolition of slavery by providing accounts of the Fugitive Slave Laws’ effects and victims. The book was published by the American Anti-Slavery Society in New York.-
CitePrintShareMay, Samuel, “The fugitive slave law and its victims,” Digital Public Library of America, http://dp.la/item/2a8c4dcae9bc48e9da5bcd5e8269105a.
The Carpet-bagger (1868)The Carpet-bagger (1868)Popular images and music from the former Confederate states during Reconstruction created the image of the Northern “carpetbagger,” a derogatory term for an opportunistic outsider who has arrived from the Northern states to exploit the Southern states out of self-interest and greed.
CitePrintShareVon Rochow, A. & Garret, T. E. (1868) The Carpet-bagger. Balmer & Weber, Saint Louis. [Notated Music] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/ihas.200002527/.
Currier & Ives, Across the Continent, "Westward the Course of Empire Takes its Way" (1868)Currier & Ives, Across the Continent, "Westward the Course of Empire Takes its Way" (1868)Images like this one helped to portray the West as vast, unpopulated, uncharted territory ready for U.S. expansion.
CitePrintShareCurrier & Ives, Ives, J. M. & Palmer, F. (1868) Across the continent, "Westward the course of empire takes its way" / J.M. Ives, del. ; drawn by F.F. Palmer. , 1868. [New York: Published by Currier & Ives, 152 Nassau Street] [Photograph]. Retrieved from Yale University Art Gallery, https://view.collections.yale.edu/m3/?manifest=https%3A//manifests.collections.yale.edu/yuag/obj/47239.
“Ho for Kansas!” Poster (1878)“Ho for Kansas!” Poster (1878)According to the Digital Public Library of America, “Benjamin Singleton established the Edgefield Real Estate and Homestead Association to help organize travel and settlement for African Americans departing Tennessee for Kansas.” Singleton was a formerly enslaved man who escaped to freedom in 1846, and he helped to organize the migration of approximately 300 African Americans to Kansas in 1877 - 1878. These migrants were not only seeking opportunity, but they were also fleeing the racial violence of white supremacists.
CitePrintShare“A broadside distributed by Benjamin Singleton advertising migration to Kansas, 1878.” Digital Public Library of America, https://dp.la/primary-source-sets/exodusters-african-american-migration-to-the-great-plains/sources/1662.
Chinese Exclusion Act (1882)The National Archives explains this law, the first in United States history to limit the ability of a designated group to immigrate into the country: “The Chinese Exclusion Act was approved on May 6, 1882….This act provided an absolute 10-year ban on Chinese laborers immigrating to the United States. For the first time, federal law proscribed entry of an ethnic working group on the premise that it endangered the good order of certain localities.
The Chinese Exclusion Act required the few non-laborers who sought entry to the United States (such as diplomatic officers) to obtain certification from the Chinese government that they were qualified to immigrate. But this group found it increasingly difficult to prove their status because the 1882 act defined laborers as "skilled and unskilled...and Chinese employed in mining." Thus very few Chinese could enter the country under the 1882 law…. Congress, moreover, refused state and federal courts the right to grant citizenship to Chinese resident aliens, although these courts could still deport them.”
An Act to execute certain treaty stipulations relating to Chinese.Whereas in the opinion of the Government of the United States the coming of Chinese laborers to this country endangers the good order of certain localities within the territory thereof: Therefore, Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the expiration of ninety days next after the passage of this act, and until the expiration of ten years next after the passage of this act, the coming of Chinese laborers to the United States be, and the same is hereby, suspended; and during such suspension it shall not be lawful for any Chinese laborer to come, or having so come after the expiration of said ninety days to remain within the United States.
SEC. 2. That the master of any vessel who shall knowingly bring within the United States on such vessel, and land or permit to be landed, any Chinese laborer, from any foreign port or place, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each and every such Chinese laborer so brought, and maybe also imprisoned for a term not exceeding one year.
SEC. 3. That the two foregoing sections shall not apply to Chinese laborers who were in the United States on the seventeenth day of November, eighteen hundred and eighty, or who shall have come into the same before the expiration of ninety days next after the passage of this act…
CitePrintShare“Chinese Exclusion Act (1882) | National Archives.” National Archives |, 17 January 2023, https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/chinese-exclusion-act.
Map showing Indian Reservations within the Limits of the United States (1883)Map showing Indian Reservations within the Limits of the United States (1883)The United States Government policies and practices of Indian removal forced multiple indigenous nations Westward, off of their land and into smaller, isolated reservations in the Western territories and states.
Indian Land Cessions in the United States (1899)Indian Land Cessions in the United States (1899)CitePrintShareRoyce, C. C. & Thomas, C. (1899) Indian land cessions in the United States. [Image] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/13023487/.
W. E. B. DuBois, Migration of Negroes. (ca. 1900)W. E. B. DuBois, Migration of Negroes. (ca. 1900)According to the Library of Congress, this chart was “prepared by [W.E.B.] Du Bois for the Negro Exhibit of the American Section at the Paris Exposition Universelle in 1900 to show the economic and social progress of African Americans since emancipation.”
CitePrintShareDu Bois, W. E. B. (ca. 1900) [The Georgia Negro] Migration of Negroes. Paris Georgia France, ca. 1900. [Photograph] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/2013650427/.
Immigration Figures for 1903Immigration Figures for 1903In the early nineteenth century, many people left their home countries seeking a better life in the United States, perceived to be a land of opportunity and wealth. During the last decades of the nineteenth century, it is estimated that nearly 12 million immigrants arrived in the United States from Germany, Ireland, and England. In the 1900s immigrants from Italy arrived in large numbers.
CitePrintShareU. S. Commissioner-General Of Immigration. ... Immigration figures for 1903. From data furnished by the Commissioner-general of immigration. Comparison of the fiscal years ending and 1903. [Pdf] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/rbpe.07902500/.
The Americanese Wall - as Congressman Burnett Would Build It (1916)The Americanese Wall - as Congressman Burnett Would Build It (1916)While immigrants often came seeking a better life or escape from oppression and economic hardship, Immigrants faced many challenges in the United States. Lack of jobs and discrimination posed barriers to many immigrant communities and many faced pressures of assimilation and hostility.
CitePrintShareEvans, R. O. & Held, J. (1916) The Americanese wall - as Congressman Burnett would build it / Evans. "Watchful waiting"; A case where it is one of "My policies" / J. Held. United States, 1916. [Photograph] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/2006681433/.
Make the Fourth of July Americanization Day (1915)Make the Fourth of July Americanization Day (1915)Throughout shifting immigration policies over the course of American history, there is also an ongoing debate about how best to assimilate new Americans. According to the Library of Congress, “though nativists may have abhorred the increasing ethnic diversity in the United States, others saw the opportunity to steep newcomers in American traditions. With four million Americans of Irish descent, hundreds of thousands of Jewish Americans with strong ties to Eastern Europe, and ten million citizens hailing from nations aligned with the Central Powers, organizations like the New York National Americanization Day Committee hoped to use patriotic holidays such as the Fourth of July as a means to unify the country's diverse populations.”
CitePrintShareMake the Fourth of July Americanization Day: Many Peoples—But One Nation. New York: National Americanization Day Committee, 1915–1919. Woodrow Wilson Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (082.00.00). https://www.loc.gov/exhibitions/world-war-i-american-experiences/about-this-exhibition/over-here/americanization/americanization-day/
“Relief units swamped by needy’s calls” (1932)“Relief units swamped by needy’s calls” (1932)During the Great Depression, hundreds of thousands of Mexicans and Mexican Americans were deported from the United States to Mexico. As unemployment increased during the 1930s, white Americans viewed Mexican immigrants and Mexican Americans as competition for scarce agricultural jobs and resources. In response, many local and state governments, often with the federal government's support, initiated a program of repatriating immigrants to Mexico. Some Mexicans, many of whom were recruited as farmworkers in the 1910s and 1920s, were offered free train rides to the border. In addition, Mexican Americans were coerced into giving up their jobs and land, forcing them to move to Mexico or find work elsewhere in the United States.
CitePrintShare“Relief units swamped by needy’s calls.” May 25, 1932. [Image] Retrieved from the Boulder County Latino History Project. https://bocolatinohistory.colorado.edu/newspaper/relief-units-swamped-by-needys-calls-1932-0
The Negro Motorist Green-Book (1936)The Negro Motorist Green-Book (1936)Between 1936 and 1967, The Green Book was published annually for African Americans traveling throughout the United States and North America. The Green Book’s original author, Victor Hugo Green, intended for the publication to act as a travel guide for African Americans during the Jim Crow Era, when laws prohibited many establishments from offering service to Black patrons. The Green Book offered suggestions to travelers seeking places and businesses which were safe for African Americans and which would treat Black patrons with dignity.
CitePrintShare(1936) The Negro motorist Green-book. New York City: V.H. Green. [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/2016298176/.
Dorothea Lange, “Migrants, family of Mexicans, on road with tire trouble. Looking for work in the peas.” (1936)Dorothea Lange, “Migrants, family of Mexicans, on road with tire trouble. Looking for work in the peas.” (1936)During the 1930s, the fallout from the Great Depression and environmental disaster struck the Great Plains region of the United States. Severe drought and resulting dust storms rendered the land in the Great Plains unfit for farming. Due to the drastic loss of jobs and income as well as the overwhelming amount of dust, which made living conditions unsafe and unbearable, millions of people left the Great Plains and headed west to California. Migrants faced a long and often dangerous journey to California as well as discrimination once they arrived.
CitePrintShareLange, D., photographer. (1936) Migrants, family of Mexicans, on road with tire trouble. Looking for work in the peas. California. United States California, 1936. Feb. [Photograph] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/2017759829/.
Dorothea Lange, “On-highway no. 1 of the ‘OK’ state near Webbers Falls, Muskogee County, Oklahoma…. (1938)Dorothea Lange, “On-highway no. 1 of the ‘OK’ state near Webbers Falls, Muskogee County, Oklahoma…. (1938)TranscriptThe photograph’s title continues: “Seven children and eldest son's family. Father was a blacksmith in Paris, Arkansas. Son was a tenant farmer. ‘We're bound for Kingfisher Oklahoma wheat and Lubbock Texas cotton. We're not trying to but we'll be in California yet. We're not going back to Arkansas; believe I can better myself’”
Dorothea Lange, a photographer whose work was funded by the New Deal’s Farm Security Administration, documented struggling workers during the Great Depression. In this photograph, a Mexican family seeks work in the fields of California.
CitePrintShareLange, D., photographer. (1938) On-highway no. 1 of the "OK" state near Webbers Falls, Muskogee County, Oklahoma. Seven children and eldest son's family. Father was a blacksmith in Paris, Arkansas. Son was a tenant farmer. "We're bound for Kingfisher Oklahoma wheat and Lubbock Texas cotton. We're not trying to but we'll be in California yet. We're not going back to Arkansas; believe I can better myself". United States Muskogee County Oklahoma Webbers Falls, 1938. June. [Photograph] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/2017770570/.
Civilian Exclusion Order #5 (1942)Civilian Exclusion Order #5 (1942)TranscriptPosted at First and Front streets, directing removal by April 7 of persons of Japanese ancestry, from the first San Francisco section to be affected by evacuation
As a response to increasing anti-Japanese sentiment after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942. Using national security as a justification, the order called for the relocation of persons of Japanese descent living in the United States. The newly formed War Relocation Authority moved nearly 120,000 Japanese Americans, the majority of whom were citizens, to “relocation centers”, most of which were located throughout the West.
CitePrintShareCivilian exclusion order #5, posted at First and Front streets, directing removal by April 7 of persons of Japanese ancestry, from the first San Francisco section to be affected by evacuation. San Francisco California, 1942. April. [Photograph] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/2001705937/.
A photograph of a Japanese-owned store hosting an “evacuation sale” prior to relocation (1942)A photograph of a Japanese-owned store hosting an “evacuation sale” prior to relocation (1942)The Japanese Americans who were affected by the Civilian Exclusion Order were given little time to leave their homes and dispose of their property before being transported from assembly centers to more permanent relocation centers.
CitePrintShare“Evacuation sale during Japanese Relocation,” Digital Public Library of America, http://dp.la/item/702db10b5c2595d9b90a31bdb3a4af23.
Ansel Adams, Manzanar from Guard Tower (c. 1942)Ansel Adams, Manzanar from Guard Tower (c. 1942)While they were not required to work, the movement of the incarcerated Japanese Americans was limited by barbed wire and guard towers.
CitePrintShareDigital ID: (digital file from original neg.) ppprs 00200 Reproduction Number: LC-DIG-ppprs-00200 (digital file from original neg.) LC-A351-T01-3-M-4-Bx (b&w film dup. neg.)
Repository: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA
Digital ID: (digital file from original neg.) ppprs 00192
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/collection/manz/item/2002695970/resource/ppprs.00200/
Immigration And Nationality Act Of 1965 (Hart-Celler Act)According to the historical account in the U.S. House of Representatives’ archives, this law “overhauled America’s immigration system during a period of deep global instability. For decades, a federal quota system had severely restricted the number of people from outside Western Europe eligible to settle in the United States. Passed during the height of the Cold War, Hart–Celler erased America’s longstanding policy of limiting immigration based on national origin….” This revision “prioritized highly skilled immigrants and opened the door for people with family already living in the United States. ..The law capped the number of annual visas at 290,000, which included a restriction of 20,000 visas per country per year…. In particular, the law created new opportunities for immigrants from Asian nations to join relatives in America. Following Hart–Celler, annual immigration jumped to nearly a half million people, and only 20 percent came from Europe.”
AN ACT:
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for other purposes.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (66 Stat. 176; 8 U.S.C. 1151) be amended to read as follows:
…Exclusive of special immigrants…the number of aliens who may be issued immigrant visas or who may otherwise acquire the status of an alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence, or who may, pursuant to section 203(a) (7) enter conditionally,…shall not in any fiscal year exceed a total of 170,000…
…No person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of his race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence…
- (1) Visas shall be first made available, in a number not to exceed 20 per centum of the number specified in section 201(a) (ii), to qualified immigrants who are the unmarried sons or daughters of citizens of the United States.
- (2) Visas shall next be made available, in a number not to exceed 20 per centum of the number specified in section 201(a) (ii), plus any visas not required for the classes specified in paragraph (1), to qualified immigrants who are the spouses, unmarried sons or unmarried daughters of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
- (3) Visas shall next be made available, in a number not to exceed 10 per centum of the number specified in section 201(a) (ii), to qualified immigrants who are members of the professions, or who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences or the arts will substantially benefit prospectively the national economy, cultural interests, or welfare of the United States….